▶ MODERN (PRECIS WRITING, HEMINGWAY, ANGLO-AMERICAN JOURNALISM)·5–10 MIN

THE TEN-WORD VERSION

Compress your argument to ten words. The compression forces honesty.

What this is

Take any argument you're making — written or held — and reduce it to ten words. Then to twenty. Notice what survives the compression and what doesn't.

The ten-word version is brutal. It strips out the qualifications, the rhetorical flourishes, the safety hedges. What's left is the actual claim. If your argument doesn't survive the compression — if the ten-word version sounds either trivial or wrong — you've learned something important about the argument.

Steps

1.Pick an argument you've made recently. Written essay, debate, position in a conversation.
2.Write the ten-word version. Exactly ten words. Cut everything else.
3.Read the ten-word version out loud. How does it sound? Defensible? Embarrassing? Surprisingly different from what you thought you were arguing?
4.Write the twenty-word version, allowing yourself one qualification. Re-read.
5.Notice the gap between the ten-word and twenty-word versions — what survived the further compression?
6.Now write the hundred-word version. Most arguments fit comfortably here. The longer original was probably padding.

▸ AFTER

What did you SAY in the long version that the ten-word version reveals you didn't actually mean?

Reflections you write below are saved to your trajectory — Claude reads the prose and adds a small dimensional shift to your map, the same way it does for daily dilemmas and diary entries.

Create an account Sign in

More on this practice

Compression has always been the test prose hides from. Blaise Pascal apologized in a 1657 letter that he'd made it longer than usual only because he 'had not the time to make it shorter' — the joke being that brevity is the expensive thing, the product of more work, not less. The precis, a standard exercise in classical and Anglo-American education, drilled exactly this: reduce a passage to a fraction of its length while keeping its argument intact, and discover how much was scaffolding.

The newsroom made a craft of it. The inverted pyramid puts the irreducible claim in the first sentence — the 'lede' — on the theory that everything after it is elaboration a hurried reader can drop. Strunk and White compressed the whole ethic into three words, 'omit needless words,' and Hemingway's 'iceberg theory' pushed further: most of a piece's substance should sit below the surface, the visible tenth carrying the weight precisely because the rest has been cut.

What the ten-word constraint does that gentle editing doesn't is make hiding impossible. Qualifications, hedges, and rhetorical throat-clearing are the first to go, and what's left is the actual claim, stripped of its protective padding. If that bare claim sounds trivial, you were padding a platitude; if it sounds wrong, the qualifications were doing more than refine the argument — they were concealing that you didn't quite believe it.

Common pitfalls

Cheating the count with hyphenates and clauses to smuggle the hedges back in. The constraint only works if you actually obey it.
Mistaking a hard-to-compress idea for a deep one. Some ideas resist ten words because they're genuinely complex; many resist because they're muddled. Be honest about which.
Stopping at the brutal version. The ten-word cut is a diagnostic, not the final draft — learn what's load-bearing, then restore only the qualifications that earn their place.

A worked example

You've written a long, hedged paragraph arguing for remote work. The ten-word version: 'Trust people to work where they focus; measure output, not presence.' Read aloud, it's clear and defensible — the compression confirms there's a real claim under the padding. You try a different paragraph, your case against a colleague's proposal, and the ten-word version comes out as 'Their plan is risky and we should probably be careful' — which, stripped of its qualifications, reveals itself as content-free caution dressed up as analysis. The first argument survived the cut; the second didn't, and now you know which of your two paragraphs was actually saying something.

Thinkers in this lineage

Blaise Pascal — Source of the 'I would have written a shorter letter if I'd had the time' insight (Lettres Provinciales, 1657).
Strunk & White — The Elements of Style distilled the ethic to 'omit needless words.'
Ernest Hemingway — His 'iceberg theory' — most of the meaning carried by what's left out — is compression as an aesthetic.

Where to read further

The Elements of Style
Strunk & White · 1959
The slim classic on cutting everything that isn't doing work.
Politics and the English Language
George Orwell · 1946
Orwell's rules for concision and against the padding that hides empty thought.

Pairs well with

Kindred practices

Elevator pitch — The business version — the whole case in the time between floors.
BLUF (bottom line up front) — The military and email convention of leading with the conclusion, then supporting it.

▶ What to do next