ANDY CLARK VS PATRICIA CHURCHLAND
▸ WHERE THEY SHARPLY DISAGREED
The three dimensions on which Andy Clark and Patricia Churchland are farthest apart on Mull's 0–10 scale.
- Trust in ExperienceΔ 1 / 10Andy Clark: 8/10Patricia Churchland: 9/10
somewhat (1/10): Patricia Churchland grounds knowing in lived experience; Andy Clark weights other sources of evidence more.
- Skeptical ReflexΔ 1 / 10Andy Clark: 6/10Patricia Churchland: 7/10
somewhat (1/10): Patricia Churchland holds doubt and suspended judgment as a discipline; Andy Clark is more willing to commit.
- Tragic VisionΔ 0 / 10Andy Clark: 4/10Patricia Churchland: 4/10
somewhat (0/10): Patricia Churchland sees tragedy and limit as central; Andy Clark doesn't make that the starting point.
▸ WHERE THEY OVERLAPPED
Where the gap is smallest — both with meaningful presence on the dimension (not "neither cared").
- Self as Illusiongap 0 / 10Andy Clark: 6/10Patricia Churchland: 6/10
Both register moderate self as illusion.
- Universalist Impulsegap 0 / 10Andy Clark: 5/10Patricia Churchland: 5/10
Both register moderate universalist impulse.
- Embodied Sensibilitygap 0 / 10Andy Clark: 6/10Patricia Churchland: 6/10
Both register moderate embodied sensibility.
▸ ALL 16 DIMENSIONS
The full vector comparison. Bars show their 0–10 scores side-by-side.
- Ascetic TendencyΔ 0
- Communal EmbeddednessΔ 0
- Embodied SensibilityΔ 0
- Mystical ReceptivityΔ 0
- Practical OrientationΔ 0
- Reverence for TraditionΔ 0
- Self as IllusionΔ 0
- Skeptical ReflexΔ 1
- Sovereign SelfΔ 0
- Theoretical DriveΔ 0
- Trust in ExperienceΔ 1
- Trust in ReasonΔ 0
- Tragic VisionΔ 0
- Universalist ImpulseΔ 0
- Vital AffirmationΔ 0
- Will to PowerΔ 0