▸ HEAD-TO-HEAD
BUDDHA VS DOGEN
Buddha
~563–483 BCE
At the edge of what language can hold.
Dogen
1200–1253
At the edge of what language can hold.
▸ WHERE THEY SHARPLY DISAGREED
The three dimensions on which Buddha and Dogen are farthest apart on Mull's 0–10 scale.
- Tragic VisionΔ 4 / 10Buddha: 10/10Dogen: 6/10
clearly (4/10): Buddha sees tragedy and limit as central; Dogen doesn't make that the starting point.
- Reverence for TraditionΔ 3 / 10Buddha: 4/10Dogen: 7/10
somewhat (3/10): Dogen treats inherited tradition as a source of wisdom; Buddha is readier to question it.
- Vital AffirmationΔ 2 / 10Buddha: 4/10Dogen: 6/10
somewhat (2/10): Dogen affirms life as it is more readily; Buddha qualifies that affirmation.
▸ WHERE THEY OVERLAPPED
Where the gap is smallest — both with meaningful presence on the dimension (not "neither cared").
- Communal Embeddednessgap 0 / 10Buddha: 7/10Dogen: 7/10
Both lean strongly into communal embeddedness.
- Trust in Experiencegap 0 / 10Buddha: 8/10Dogen: 8/10
Both lean strongly into trust in experience.
- Trust in Reasongap 0 / 10Buddha: 4/10Dogen: 4/10
Both keep trust in reason muted.
▸ ALL 16 DIMENSIONS
The full vector comparison. Bars show their 0–10 scores side-by-side.
- Ascetic TendencyΔ 1
- Communal EmbeddednessΔ 0
- Embodied SensibilityΔ 2
- Mystical ReceptivityΔ 1
- Practical OrientationΔ 1
- Reverence for TraditionΔ 3
- Self as IllusionΔ 1
- Skeptical ReflexΔ 1
- Sovereign SelfΔ 1
- Theoretical DriveΔ 1
- Trust in ExperienceΔ 0
- Trust in ReasonΔ 0
- Tragic VisionΔ 4
- Universalist ImpulseΔ 1
- Vital AffirmationΔ 2
- Will to PowerΔ 0
◀ BUDDHADOGEN ▶
▶ What to do next