DAVID BOHM VS WHITEHEAD'S PUPIL — DAVID RAY GRIFFIN
▸ WHERE THEY SHARPLY DISAGREED
The three dimensions on which David Bohm and Whitehead's pupil — David Ray Griffin are farthest apart on Mull's 0–10 scale.
- Vital AffirmationΔ 1 / 10David Bohm: 7/10Whitehead's pupil — David Ray Griffin: 6/10
somewhat (1/10): David Bohm affirms life as it is more readily; Whitehead's pupil — David Ray Griffin qualifies that affirmation.
- Reverence for TraditionΔ 1 / 10David Bohm: 5/10Whitehead's pupil — David Ray Griffin: 6/10
somewhat (1/10): Whitehead's pupil — David Ray Griffin treats inherited tradition as a source of wisdom; David Bohm is readier to question it.
- Tragic VisionΔ 0 / 10David Bohm: 5/10Whitehead's pupil — David Ray Griffin: 5/10
somewhat (0/10): Whitehead's pupil — David Ray Griffin sees tragedy and limit as central; David Bohm doesn't make that the starting point.
▸ WHERE THEY OVERLAPPED
Where the gap is smallest — both with meaningful presence on the dimension (not "neither cared").
- Self as Illusiongap 0 / 10David Bohm: 5/10Whitehead's pupil — David Ray Griffin: 5/10
Both register moderate self as illusion.
- Universalist Impulsegap 0 / 10David Bohm: 6/10Whitehead's pupil — David Ray Griffin: 6/10
Both register moderate universalist impulse.
- Embodied Sensibilitygap 0 / 10David Bohm: 5/10Whitehead's pupil — David Ray Griffin: 5/10
Both register moderate embodied sensibility.
▸ ALL 16 DIMENSIONS
The full vector comparison. Bars show their 0–10 scores side-by-side.
- Ascetic TendencyΔ 0
- Communal EmbeddednessΔ 0
- Embodied SensibilityΔ 0
- Mystical ReceptivityΔ 0
- Practical OrientationΔ 0
- Reverence for TraditionΔ 1
- Self as IllusionΔ 0
- Skeptical ReflexΔ 0
- Sovereign SelfΔ 0
- Theoretical DriveΔ 0
- Trust in ExperienceΔ 0
- Trust in ReasonΔ 0
- Tragic VisionΔ 0
- Universalist ImpulseΔ 0
- Vital AffirmationΔ 1
- Will to PowerΔ 0