EDUARDO KOHN VS LINDA TUHIWAI SMITH
▸ WHERE THEY SHARPLY DISAGREED
The three dimensions on which Eduardo Kohn and Linda Tuhiwai Smith are farthest apart on Mull's 0–10 scale.
- Reverence for TraditionΔ 2 / 10Eduardo Kohn: 8/10Linda Tuhiwai Smith: 6/10
somewhat (2/10): Eduardo Kohn treats inherited tradition as a source of wisdom; Linda Tuhiwai Smith is readier to question it.
- Communal EmbeddednessΔ 1 / 10Eduardo Kohn: 8/10Linda Tuhiwai Smith: 7/10
somewhat (1/10): Eduardo Kohn locates the self in community and relationship; Linda Tuhiwai Smith starts from the individual.
- Self as IllusionΔ 1 / 10Eduardo Kohn: 5/10Linda Tuhiwai Smith: 4/10
somewhat (1/10): Eduardo Kohn treats the unified self as an illusion or construction; Linda Tuhiwai Smith takes the self as more given.
▸ WHERE THEY OVERLAPPED
Where the gap is smallest — both with meaningful presence on the dimension (not "neither cared").
- Universalist Impulsegap 0 / 10Eduardo Kohn: 4/10Linda Tuhiwai Smith: 4/10
Both keep universalist impulse muted.
- Embodied Sensibilitygap 0 / 10Eduardo Kohn: 7/10Linda Tuhiwai Smith: 7/10
Both lean strongly into embodied sensibility.
- Ascetic Tendencygap 0 / 10Eduardo Kohn: 5/10Linda Tuhiwai Smith: 5/10
Both register moderate ascetic tendency.
▸ ALL 16 DIMENSIONS
The full vector comparison. Bars show their 0–10 scores side-by-side.
- Ascetic TendencyΔ 0
- Communal EmbeddednessΔ 1
- Embodied SensibilityΔ 0
- Mystical ReceptivityΔ 0
- Practical OrientationΔ 0
- Reverence for TraditionΔ 2
- Self as IllusionΔ 1
- Skeptical ReflexΔ 0
- Sovereign SelfΔ 0
- Theoretical DriveΔ 0
- Trust in ExperienceΔ 0
- Trust in ReasonΔ 0
- Tragic VisionΔ 0
- Universalist ImpulseΔ 0
- Vital AffirmationΔ 0
- Will to PowerΔ 0
Where do you sit between Eduardo Kohn and Linda Tuhiwai Smith?
- 01 · QUIZThe InheritorTake the quiz — see which of them you sit closer to on the map.CONTINUE ▶
- 02 · PROFILEEduardo Viveiros de CastroA third thinker who sits between them — useful for triangulating.CONTINUE ▶
- 03 · ARENAArgue Eduardo KohnFace Eduardo Kohn in a 5-minute single-turn debate, judged on rigor.CONTINUE ▶