OWEN FLANAGAN VS SUSAN HAACK

▸ WHERE THEY SHARPLY DISAGREED

The three dimensions on which Owen Flanagan and Susan Haack are farthest apart on Mull's 0–10 scale.

• Universalist ImpulseΔ 1 / 10
  Owen Flanagan: 6/10

  Susan Haack: 5/10

  somewhat (1/10): Owen Flanagan reaches for universal moral principles; Susan Haack weighs particular contexts more heavily.

• Tragic VisionΔ 0 / 10
  Owen Flanagan: 4/10

  Susan Haack: 4/10

  somewhat (0/10): Susan Haack sees tragedy and limit as central; Owen Flanagan doesn't make that the starting point.

• Vital AffirmationΔ 0 / 10
  Owen Flanagan: 6/10

  Susan Haack: 6/10

  somewhat (0/10): Susan Haack affirms life as it is more readily; Owen Flanagan qualifies that affirmation.

▸ WHERE THEY OVERLAPPED

Where the gap is smallest — both with meaningful presence on the dimension (not "neither cared").

• Self as Illusiongap 0 / 10
  Owen Flanagan: 5/10

  Susan Haack: 5/10

  Both register moderate self as illusion.

• Embodied Sensibilitygap 0 / 10
  Owen Flanagan: 6/10

  Susan Haack: 6/10

  Both register moderate embodied sensibility.

• Ascetic Tendencygap 0 / 10
  Owen Flanagan: 4/10

  Susan Haack: 4/10

  Both keep ascetic tendency muted.

▸ ALL 16 DIMENSIONS

The full vector comparison. Bars show their 0–10 scores side-by-side.

Where do you sit between Owen Flanagan and Susan Haack?

1. 01 · QUIZ

   ◆

   The Inheritor

   Take the quiz — see which of them you sit closer to on the map.

   CONTINUE ▶
   ▶
   ▼
2. 02 · PROFILE

   Ruth Millikan

   A third thinker who sits between them — useful for triangulating.

   CONTINUE ▶
   ▶
   ▼
3. 03 · ARENA

   ⚔

   Argue Owen Flanagan

   Face Owen Flanagan in a 5-minute single-turn debate, judged on rigor.

   CONTINUE ▶