RUTH MILLIKAN VS SUSAN HAACK

▸ WHERE THEY SHARPLY DISAGREED

The three dimensions on which Ruth Millikan and Susan Haack are farthest apart on Mull's 0–10 scale.

• Trust in ExperienceΔ 1 / 10
  Ruth Millikan: 8/10

  Susan Haack: 7/10

  somewhat (1/10): Ruth Millikan grounds knowing in lived experience; Susan Haack weights other sources of evidence more.

• Practical OrientationΔ 1 / 10
  Ruth Millikan: 7/10

  Susan Haack: 6/10

  somewhat (1/10): Ruth Millikan is oriented toward what helps a life go well in practice; Susan Haack foregrounds other priorities.

• Tragic VisionΔ 0 / 10
  Ruth Millikan: 4/10

  Susan Haack: 4/10

  somewhat (0/10): Susan Haack sees tragedy and limit as central; Ruth Millikan doesn't make that the starting point.

▸ WHERE THEY OVERLAPPED

Where the gap is smallest — both with meaningful presence on the dimension (not "neither cared").

• Self as Illusiongap 0 / 10
  Ruth Millikan: 5/10

  Susan Haack: 5/10

  Both register moderate self as illusion.

• Universalist Impulsegap 0 / 10
  Ruth Millikan: 5/10

  Susan Haack: 5/10

  Both register moderate universalist impulse.

• Embodied Sensibilitygap 0 / 10
  Ruth Millikan: 6/10

  Susan Haack: 6/10

  Both register moderate embodied sensibility.

▸ ALL 16 DIMENSIONS

The full vector comparison. Bars show their 0–10 scores side-by-side.

Where do you sit between Ruth Millikan and Susan Haack?

1. 01 · QUIZ

   ◆

   The Inheritor

   Take the quiz — see which of them you sit closer to on the map.

   CONTINUE ▶
   ▶
   ▼
2. 02 · PROFILE

   Owen Flanagan

   A third thinker who sits between them — useful for triangulating.

   CONTINUE ▶
   ▶
   ▼
3. 03 · ARENA

   ⚔

   Argue Ruth Millikan

   Face Ruth Millikan in a 5-minute single-turn debate, judged on rigor.

   CONTINUE ▶